one
Nanning
Guangxi youjiete detection co., ltd
1.The inspection report numbered "U.J.T.H.Zi. [2022]No. 01-12" has subcontracted the water quality organochlorine detection project, but failed to provide the subcontractor’s ability assessment materials, and the subcontracting agreement did not specify that the subcontractor could not subcontract it twice.
2.In the inspection report numbered "U.J.T.H.Zi. [2022] No.10-3", HJ 836-2017 was used to detect low-concentration particles in the laboratory, and the conditions of constant temperature and humidity for inspection and detection could not meet the requirements of HJ 836-2017 standard.
3.The ultraviolet spectrophotometer (No.:YJT-YQ-022) used for petroleum analysis was not placed in the fume hood, which did not meet the requirements of the standard HJ970-2018.
Order correction within a time limit
2
Nanning
Guangxi ronghui environment technology co., ltd
1.The inspection project file with task number RH-2021-1220 involves the subcontracting of sulfide inspection projects in water, but there is no evaluation material for the subcontractor’s ability to complete the task.
2.Refrigerator A-166 in sample handover room cannot meet the requirements of 0-4 degrees Celsius storage conditions.
3.Chapter IV 4.2.1.2 of the Quality Manual (RHHJ-SC-9) (Third Edition) requires more than 10% of personnel with intermediate titles or above and the same ability, which is inconsistent with the supplementary requirement of 15% for qualification assessment.
Order correction within a time limit
three
Nanning
Guangxi ansheng detection technology co., ltd
1.The inspection reportNo. AS20230106 is subcontracted, and the subcontractor’s ability to complete the subcontracted tasks is not provided; Failing to provide evidence that the client agrees to subcontract.
2.According to the inspection report with the number AS20230161, the detection limit of the total chlorine detection method is 0.03mg/L, and the analysis result of the sample with the number AS20230161-3 is 0.02mg/L, which is lower than the detection limit. The monitoring result indicates that it does not meet the requirements of Technical Specification for Wastewater Monitoring (HJ 91.1-2019).
3.The controlled version of Determination of Free Chlorine and Total Chlorine in Water Quality (HJ 586-2010) is used by the organization as the release draft, which is not a formal standard text.
4.2022The management review materials of 2008 lack the input contents such as controllability of risk identification.
Order correction within a time limit
four
Nanning
Guangxi xingui environmental protection technology group co., ltd
1.The report numbered "Xinguijian (Radiation) Zi [2023] No.02097" did not apply the calibration factor of the verification certificate of X-γ radiometer (instrument number XG1.-050).
2.According to the report numbered "Xinguijian (Water) Zi [2023] No.025", the original record of BOD analysis for five days used the incubator with model number SPX-250-0II/XG-001002, and the organization could not provide the equipment calibration certificate, instrument use record and other materials.
3.The report with the serial number of "Xinguijian (Sound) Zi [2022] No.030" shows that the monitoring time is inconsistent with the original record of noise monitoring; In the report, the Leq of monitoring point N3 at night and in daytime is inconsistent with the original record of noise monitoring.
4.The report with the number of "Xinguijian (Water) Zi [2022] No.382" shows that the sample characteristics are inconsistent with the sensory description of the sample state in the "Original Record Table for Sampling of Surface Water Routine Projects"; The cross-section water quality description fails to record the information such as whether there is oil film on the water surface and whether there is algae in the water body according to the technical specification for surface water environmental quality monitoring; The original records of volatile phenol did not record the slope, intercept and correlation coefficient.
5.Authorized signatories, including Chen Deyi, Huang Hong, Ma Hunguang and Huang Yuqun, have all left their posts and failed to go through the change procedures as required.
6.2021The annual management review time is May 25, 2021, the 2022 management review time is May 30, 2022, and the 2023 management review has not been carried out at the time of inspection, which can not meet the requirements of the general requirements for qualification accreditation review of inspection and testing institutions.
Order correction within a time limit
five
Nanning
Puni test group Guangxi co., ltd
1.According to the inspection report numbered "LRBCWW1Z0240335H9Z", only the indicated error was calibrated before and after sulfur dioxide measurement, but the system deviation, zero drift and range drift were not calibrated according to the requirements of HJ 57-2017 standard. The original records of flue gas calibration are not archived synchronously with the report.
2.No. "LRBCWW1Z0240465H9Z" inspection report, unorganized ammonia sampling of waste gas, and record the storage method of missing samples.
3.No. "LRBCWW1Z0240305H9Z" is reported, and the color characteristics and pH value of the sample are not reported at the same time according to the requirements of HJ 1182-2021.
4.2020~2022The annual management review time is January 16, 2021, February 11, 2022 and February 3, 2023, respectively, in which the management review time in 2020 and 2021 has exceeded 12 months, which does not meet the general requirements for the accreditation and review of inspection and testing institutions.
Order correction within a time limit
six
Nanning
Guangxi nanhuan detection technology co., ltd
1.TaskNo. [2023] C02-12, "No secondary subcontracting" is not stipulated in the entrusted monitoring report and the subcontracting sample submission form; The indicated error of flue gas such as sulfur dioxide is calibrated, but the system deviation, zero drift and range drift are not calibrated according to the requirements of HJ 57-2017 standard; The sampling volume of unorganized odor concentration sample is 5L, which can not meet the minimum volume of 5.4L required for sample analysis.
2.Task number [2023]No. Z06-89, the sample is self-delivered, 1 bottle of 2L water sample, and the sample container is a plastic bottle, with 8 detection items (total number of colonies, total coliforms, pH value, chromaticity, turbidity, odor and taste, oxygen consumption, visible objects). Do not meet the requirements of the detection method for sample sampling containers, individual sampling, etc.
Order correction within a time limit
seven
Nanning
Guangxi huarui environment detection co., ltd
1.In the inspection report with the number of "Huarui Yanzi [2023] No.115", the ambient air sulfur dioxide record failed to meet the requirements of HJ 482-2009 standard, and two field blanks were determined for each batch of samples; Only the indication error and system deviation are calibrated in the sulfur dioxide records of fixed pollution sources, but the zero drift and range drift are not calibrated according to the requirements of HJ 57-2017 standard.
2.No. "Hua Rui Jian Zi [2023] No.107" inspection report, the pH value record is not in accordance with.HJ 1147-2020Standard determination certified standard sample or standard substance.
3.According to the inspection report with the number "Huarui Yanzi [2023] No.072", the ammonia gas recorded in the sample handover sheet is stored at room temperature, which does not meet the requirements of HJ 533-2009 standard for cold storage. The odor concentration of pollution sources is short of t-test to judge whether there is a significant difference in the olfactory threshold.
4.No. "Hua Rui Jian Zi [2023] No.026" inspection report, which was not in accordance with the original records of methane.
HJ 604-2017The blank and parallel samples were determined, and the certified standard gas was not determined after each batch of samples was analyzed.
5.The evaluation basis of internal audit and management review of institutions lacks the general requirements for qualification accreditation and evaluation of inspection and testing institutions and the supplementary requirements for ecological environment monitoring and evaluation.
6.The institution obtained the qualification certificate for the first time in January 2023, and has not participated in the 2023 competency verification so far.
Order correction within a time limit
eight
Nanning
Guangxi yipu detection technology co., ltd
1.In the inspection report numbered "YP2223040089", the wastewater samples were monitored according to the requirements in GB/T 11901-1989 and HJ 91.1-2019. The original sampling record showed that the sampling date was May 5, 2023, the original analysis record showed that the testing time was May 8-9, 2023, and neither the original sampling record nor the original testing record showed the sample storage temperature.
2.The organization’s quality control plan for 2023 shows that quality controller Cai Yanhong is supervising with codes 07 and 08, while the quality supervision record form (indoor testing) provided by the laboratory is supervised with codes 05, 07 and 11, and the supervision implementation time is February 16, 2022.
3.The petroleum standard substance of tetrachloroethylene has been used in Kaifeng, and there are multiple standard substance numbers in the same bottle.
(02221483-240131、SL1160101-240131、02221552-240131); The reference material/solution label shows that the configuration date is February 10, 2022, and the validity period is January 2024.31Day.
Order correction within a time limit
nine
Liuzhou
Ecological environment of Liuzhou, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
monitoring center
The testing environment facilities can’t meet the requirements of the standard: the separatory funnel oscillator (No.CZ230503) used for extracting organic compounds is placed on the ground without ventilation conditions; The balance (No.33790388) is placed in a fume hood for use; There is no regional storage mark in the sample handover room.
Order correction within a time limit
10
Liuzhou
Liuzhou Liu vocational college inspection detection co., ltd
1.The three purification cylinders of the gas chromatograph air purification device numbered LZ-Y24 for detecting non-methane total hydrocarbons are filled with color-changing silica gel, but one of them is not filled with activated carbon according to the standard requirements.
2.The microwave digester numbered LZ-Y238 was placed on the workbench without exhaust facilities.
3.In the microbiology laboratory, a tilting oscillator for solid waste extraction is placed in the same room as the biological incubator, which does not meet the standard.
Order correction within a time limit
11
Liuzhou
Guangxi Ankang detection technology co., ltd
1.In the inspection report numbered "H & S020D032001", the chemical oxygen demand (COD) of wastewater was not determined according to the standard HJ 828-2017 "Determination of COD in Water Quality".
2.High-temperature electric furnace and organic waste liquid chloroform are placed in two adjacent fume hoods in the physical and chemical pretreatment room, which has cross-contamination and potential safety hazards.
Order correction within a time limit
twelve
Guilin
Guangxi Jintian Environmental Engineering Co., Ltd.
The original record of the inspection report with the number "Jin Tian (Jian) Zi [2023]No. 23S046" has no materials on the inspection ability of the subcontractor’s inspection items.
Order correction within a time limit
13
Guilin
Guangxi shengzhiyuan environment monitoring co., ltd
The original record of the inspection report numbered "Sheng Yuan Jian (Water) Zi [2023] No.03199" and the Calibration Record of Portable pH Meter and Residual Chlorine Tester (No.I-30), the standard solution used for pH meter calibration has no corresponding preparation record, so the calibration process of the instrument cannot be traced back.
Order correction within a time limit
14
guest
Guangxi taijian monitoring co., ltd
1. The original records of total phosphorus in three inspection reports numbered "TJ (J) Zi [2022] No.674", "TJ (J) Zi [2022] No.922" and "TJJ202302-023" were detected on August 25th, December 14th, 2022, respectively.
2.In the inspection report of "TJ (J) Zi [2022] No.674", the ammonia nitrogen standard curve was originally recorded by ammonia nitrogen spectrophotometry, and the date of configuration was August 20, 2022, and the date of sample analysis was August 26, 2022, without calibration of standard curve points.
3.The label of soil sample TR1-6-1 does not indicate the sample mesh number, so it is impossible to judge whether the retained sample meets the requirements of different mesh numbers in the detection of soil pH value, moisture and other indicators.
4.According to the notification of Gui Shi Jian Han [2022] No.2765, the ability verification and assessment of manganese and zinc in the air of this institution was "suspicious". Participating in the measurement audit, the evaluation results of manganese and zinc in the air are "unsatisfactory".
5.The annual management review time of institutions in 2021 is January 20, 2022, and the annual management review time in 2022 is February 13, 2023, which can not meet the general requirements for qualification accreditation and review of inspection and testing institutions.
Order correction within a time limit